My Security Planet » Schneier on Security » Biases in Forensic Science

Feeds

13617 items (0 unread) in 75 feeds

• Jeremy Zawodny's blog
• Mozilla Webdev
• Transcendental Technical Travails
• Ian Bicking: a blog
• Hackosis

WebSecurity

• Watchfire Application Security Insider
• BlogSecurity
• sirdarckcat
• Google Online Security Blog
• CGISecurity.com: Your Web Site and Application Security Resource
• Switch/Twitch
• mybeNi websecurity
• cat slave diary
• SecuriTeam Blogs
• Curiouser and Curiouser
• Alex's Corner
• Billy (BK) Rios
• Chris Shiflett
• christian's weblog
• funkatron.com
• GNUCITIZEN
• The Spanner
• hackademix.net
• Ruby on Rails Security Project
• It's a shampoo world anyway
• Web Security Blog
• ha.ckers.org web application security lab
• Yet Another Infosec Blog
• PHP Security Blog
• Security Thoughts
• Sunnet Beskerming Security Advisories
• Disenchant's Blog
• Sylvan von Stuppe
• Larholm.com
• The Turkey Curse
• Jeremiah Grossman
• Anurag Agarwal - Application Security Evangelist
• Ivan Ristic
• deep inside | security & tools
• omg.wtf.bbq.
• BlueHat Security Briefings
• Tactical Web Application Security
• .:Computer Defense:.

Security

• tssci security
• Plynt Penetration Testing Blog
• Michael Howard's Web Log
• Security Retentive
• BindShell.Net
• Dominic White's .tHE pRODUCT
• SecurityFocus News
• Justice League
• Schneier on Security
• Rational Survivability
• terminal23
• 1 Raindrop
• hiredhacker.com
• Matasano Chargen
• Security Vulnerability Research & Defense
• Michael on Security - Musings on Information Security
• Fortify blog
• The Art of Software Security Assessment
• GDS Security Blog
• Vodun.org
• Robert Penz Blog
• Mark Curphey - SecurityBuddha.com
• Liminal states
• Security Ripcord
• ModSecurity Blog
• IBM Internet Security Systems Frequency X Blog
• Suspekt...
• extern blog SensePost;
• Zero in a bit

SEO

• SEO BlackHat: Black Hat SEO Blog
• busin3ss.name

Tools

• Opensourcetesting.org News

Schneier on Security

• 

  Biases in Forensic Science

  Posted: January 31st, 2012, 11:13am CST

  Tags:    [edit]

  Some errors in forensic science may be the result of the biases of the examiners: Though they cannot prove it, Dr Dror and Dr Hampikian suspect the difference in contextual information given to the examiners was the cause of the different results. The original pair may have subliminally interpreted ambiguous information in a way helpful to the prosecution, even though...